ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer最も有効な質問と解答で勉強

PECB ISO 22301 Lead Implementer Certificationは出題範囲が広く、独学だけでは論点の取りこぼしが起きがちな試験です。Tech4Examが用意するISO-22301-Lead-Implementer向けの82問の問題集は、本試験の傾向を踏まえて構成されており、苦手分野を的確に洗い出せます。

PECB ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer 試験概要:

PECB ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer 試験シラバストピック:

ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer試験のQ&A – 受験前に知っておきたいこと

PECB ISO 22301 Lead Implementer Certification 認定 ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer 試験問題：

問題 #1

Scenario:
Initar, an IT security service company in New Jersey, provides 24/7 cloud and IT infrastructure support to mid-sized companies. Recognizing the need for a robust business continuity strategy, Initar transitioned from informal business continuity planning to implementing a BCMS based on ISO 22301.
During the BCMS implementation, a major nonconformity was identified: the BIA report lacked a defined Maximum Tolerable Period of Disruption (MTPD), which is required by ISO 22301. The corrective action process began with the IT team conducting a root cause analysis using a cause-and-effect diagram. Based on the analysis, an action plan was drafted to update all BIAs and establish the MTPD. The plan was approved by the head of the IT department, who monitored its implementation, while the internal auditor reviewed the effectiveness of the corrective action.
According to Scenario 7, the internal auditor followed up on the corrective action and reviewed its effectiveness. Is this acceptable?

A. Yes, only if a review of the effectiveness of corrective actions is really necessary.
B. No, based on ISO 22301, it is not the responsibility of the internal auditors to review the effectiveness of corrective actions.
C. Yes, based on ISO 22301, after implementing any actions needed, a review of the effectiveness of corrective actions should happen.

問題 #2

What should the organization avoid when implementing the BCMS?

A. Upgrading the organization's technology when initiating the BCMS implementation.
B. Targeting continual improvement at the beginning of the implementation.
C. Involving external interested parties during the Plan stage of the BCMS implementation process.

問題 #3

Scenario:
Belle, a food and beverage processing company, is dedicated to crafting products that meetcustomers' needs while promoting healthier lifestyles. Central to its mission is a commitment to upholding the highest food safety standards and ensuring the consistent quality of their offerings. From the initial stages of preparation through processing, packaging, and transportation, Belle maintains rigorous control over every aspect of food production.
Recognizing the importance of resilience in potential disruptions, Belle adopted a business continuity management system (BCMS) based on ISO 22301. By implementing this system, Belle aimed not only to ensure uninterrupted product delivery but also to enhance its reputation, foster customer confidence, and gain a competitive edge. To oversee the BCMS implementation, Belle appointed a dedicated business continuity project team responsible for leading the BCMS implementation project. It also assigned a business continuity manager responsible and accountable for the BCMS overall.
Before initiating the BCMS implementation, the BCM team conducted a thorough analysis of the stakeholders involved. Using specialized tools, they categorized stakeholders according to their influence, expected level of involvement, and anticipated contribution throughout the implementation of the BCMS and related activities.
Throughout the BCMS implementation process, Belle's top management emphasized the integration of business continuity principles into existing processes, aligning them with the organization's strategic objectives. They developed the business continuity objectives and the BCMS scope. To ensure widespread understanding and adoption of the BCMS among employees, the BCM team developed an instructional video explaining the business continuity policy. Recognizing the unfamiliarity of employees with business continuity terminology, the team subsequently devised a comprehensive training program aimed at enhancing staff competence in BCMS matters. This initiative not only educated employees about the policy but also underscored the benefits of improved business continuity performance.
The organization also established evaluation methods to assess the impact of competence trainings. It measured the staff engagement and retention levels, as well as performance against training objectives.
As Belle continued to innovate and expand its product and service offerings, the organization revisited its BCMS scope to remain aligned with evolving priorities. Recent additions to the scope included a new department and two new products aligning with its updated business continuity objectives to enhance the safety of raw materials and key ingredients.
In response to potential disruptive risks, Belle established clear protocols outlining specific actions to be taken, assigning responsibilities, and defining criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of these measures. By proactively addressing risks and fortifying its resilience, Belle aimed to uphold its dedication to delivering safe, top-quality products while also safeguarding the interests of its stakeholders.
As stated in Scenario 3, the BCM team communicated the importance of the BCMS and explained the policy through a video. Is this acceptable?

A. No, the business continuity policy should only be communicated verbally by the top management.
B. No, the business continuity policy should be communicated formally, such as through emails, meetings, rather than through alternative means.
C. Yes, sharing a video in which the policy is explained is also a valid method of communication.

問題 #4

Scenario:
Initar, an IT security service company in New Jersey, provides 24/7 cloud and IT infrastructure support to mid-sized companies. Recognizing the need for a robust business continuity strategy, Initar transitioned from informal business continuity planning to implementing a BCMS based on ISO 22301.
During the BCMS implementation, a major nonconformity was identified: the BIA report lacked a defined Maximum Tolerable Period of Disruption (MTPD), which is required by ISO 22301. The corrective action process began with the IT team conducting a root cause analysis using a cause-and-effect diagram. Based on the analysis, an action plan was drafted to update all BIAs and establish the MTPD. The plan was approved by the head of the IT department, who monitored its implementation, while the internal auditor reviewed the effectiveness of the corrective action.
What did Initar conduct to identify the source of the problem?

A. Comparative analysis
B. Root cause analysis
C. Audit follow-up

問題 #5

Scenario:
Prebank is a multinational financial institution. Its services include banking and investing through banking centers, ATMs, and mobile banking platforms. With millions of clients, Prebank's databasesystems record vast amounts of data and transactions daily. Its main activities depend on the ability of its employees to access clients' data through its database system at any time.
Recently, Prebank's database system stopped working unexpectedly. Soon after, it was discovered that this disruption was caused by the maintenance work on the road outside the company's office building. During the road repair, the workers had unintentionally damaged a water pipe that leaked into Prebank's basement. This leakage affected the company's electrical infrastructure, resulting in a loss of power, which shut down equipment and computers in the server room. Consequently, employees were unable to access Prebank's database system.
After this incident, the employees immediately notified Prebank's IT team. Subsequently, the IT team informed both the maintenance company responsible for the roadworks and the insurance company. The company responsible for maintenance told Prebank's IT team that the maintenance team was not available for the day. Since Prebank did not have a plan for responding to similar disruptions, they had to stop working and go home. Thankfully, the maintenance team arrived at the scene on the next day and made all the necessary repairs, allowing Prebank to resume all its operations.
Following these events, Prebank decided to change its strategy and procedures to prioritize business continuity planning within the company. Its main focus was to address the root cause of disruptions to improve business continuity. As such, the top management decided to implement a Business Continuity Management System (BCMS) based on ISO 22301.
After setting the company's business continuity objectives, the company established a project team, including a project manager and four additional team members. The BCM team was responsible for managing the BCMS implementation process, whereas the top management was responsible for the effectiveness of the BCMS. Through analyzing potential risk scenarios, the team defined Prebank's business continuity strategy as well as the resources for supporting business continuity within the company. This enabled the team to predict the impact of disruptions caused by various incidents, such as power outages. Following these actions, the company established a business continuity plan to manage disruptions effectively without impacting the workflow.
The effective implementation of the BCMS helped Prebank not only minimize losses and ensure continuity in its services but also absorb and adapt to a changing environment.
BCMS implementation helped Prebank to absorb and adapt in a changing environment. What is this ability known as?

A. Risk control
B. Organizational resilience
C. Emergency preparedness

解説：