MCIA-Level-1最も有効な質問と解答で勉強

MuleSoft Certified Integration Architect - Level 1は出題範囲が広く、独学だけでは論点の取りこぼしが起きがちな試験です。Tech4Examが用意するMCIA-Level-1向けの275問の問題集は、本試験の傾向を踏まえて構成されており、苦手分野を的確に洗い出せます。

MuleSoft MCIA-Level-1 試験概要:

MuleSoft MCIA-Level-1 試験シラバストピック:

MCIA-Level-1試験のQ&A – 受験前に知っておきたいこと

MuleSoft Certified Integration Architect - Level 1 認定 MCIA-Level-1 試験問題：

問題 #1

An organization is designing multiple new applications to run on CloudHub in a single Anypoint VPC and that must share data using a common persistent Anypoint object store V2 (OSv2).
Which design gives these mule applications access to the same object store instance?

A. An Anypoint MQ connector configured to directly access the persistent object store
B. The object store V2 rest API configured to access the persistent object store
C. Object store V2 can be shared across cloudhub applications with the configured osv2 connector
D. AVM connector configured to directly access the persistence queue of the persistent object store

問題 #2

What is a key difference between synchronous and asynchronous logging from Mule applications?

A. Asynchronous logging produces more reliable audit trails with more accurate timestamps
B. Synchronous logging writes log messages in a single logging thread but does not block the Mule event being processed by the next event processor
C. Asynchronous logging can improve Mule event processing throughput while also reducing the processing time for each Mule event
D. Synchronous logging within an ongoing transaction writes log messages in the same thread that processes the current Mule event

問題 #3

An organization plans to extend its Mule APIs to the EU (Frankfurt) region.
Currently, all Mule applications are deployed to CloudHub 1.0 in the default North American region, from the North America control plane, following this naming convention: {API-name}-{environment} (for example, Orderssapi-dev, Orders-sapi--qa, Orders-sapi--prod, etc.).
There is no network restriction to block communications between APIs.
What strategy should be implemented in order to deploy the same Mule APIs to the CloudHub 1.0 EU region from the North America control plane, as well as to minimize latency between APIs and target users and systems in Europe?

A. In API Manager, set the Region property to EU (Frankfurt) to create an API proxy named {API-name}-proxy-{environment} for each Mule application.
Communicate the new url {API-name}-proxy-{environment}.de-c1.cloudhub.io to the consuming API clients In Europe.
B. In API Manager, leave the Region property blank (default) to deploy an API proxy named
{API-name}~proxy~- (environment}.de-cl for each Mule application.
Communicate the new url {API-name}-proxy-{environment}.de-cl.cloudhub.io to the consuming API clients in Europe.
C. In Runtime Manager, for each Mule application deployment, leave the Region property blank (default) and change the Mule application name to {API-name}-
{environment).de-cl.
Communicate the new urls {API-name}-{environment}.de-ci1.cloudhub.io to the consuming API clients in Europe.
D. In Runtime Manager, for each Mule application deployment, set the Region property to EU (Frankfurt) and reuse the same Mule application mame as in the North American region.
Communicate the new urls {API-name}-{environment}.de-ci.cloudhub.io to the consuming API clients In Europe.

問題 #4

What approach configures an API gateway to hide sensitive data exchanged between API consumers and API implementations, but can convert tokenized fields back to their original value for other API requests or responses, without having to recode the API implementations?

A. Use a field-level encryption policy in an API gateway to replace sensitive fields in message payload with encrypted values, and apply a corresponding field-level decryption policy to return the original values to other APIs
B. Create a tokenization format and use it to apply a tokenization policy in an API gateway to replace sensitive fields in message payload with similarly formatted tokenized values, and apply a corresponding detokenization policy to return the original values to other APIs
C. Create both masking and tokenization formats and use both to apply a tokenization policy in an API gateway to mask sensitive values in message payloads withcharacters, and apply a corresponding detokenization policy to return the original values to other APIs
D. Create a masking format and use it to apply a tokenization policy in an API gateway to mask sensitive values in message payloads with characters, and apply a corresponding detokenization policy to return the original values to other APIs

問題 #5

Mule application muleA deployed in cloudhub uses Object Store v2 to share data across instances. As a part of new requirement , application muleB which is deployed in same region wants to access this Object Store.
Which of the following option you would suggest which will have minimum latency in this scenario?

A. Object Store REST API
B. Object Store of one mule application cannot be accessed by other mule application.
C. Object Store connector
D. Both of the above option will have same latency

解説：