信頼できるアフターサービス

私たちのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験学習資料で試験準備は簡単ですが、使用中に問題が発生する可能性があります。ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor pdf版問題集に関する問題がある場合は、私たちに電子メールを送って、私たちの助けを求めることができます。たあなたが新旧の顧客であっても、私たちはできるだけ早くお客様のお手伝いをさせて頂きます。候補者がISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam試験に合格する手助けをしている私たちのコミットメントは、当業界において大きな名声を獲得しています。一週24時間のサービスは弊社の態度を示しています。私たちは候補者の利益を考慮し、我々のISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor有用テスト参考書はあなたのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験合格に最良の方法であることを保証します。

要するに、プロのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験認定はあなた自身を計る最も効率的な方法であり、企業は教育の背景だけでなく、あなたの職業スキルによって従業員を採用することを指摘すると思います。世界中の技術革新によって、あなたをより強くする重要な方法はISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam試験認定を受けることです。だから、私たちの信頼できる高品質のAI management system (AIMS)有効練習問題集を選ぶと、ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験に合格し、より明るい未来を受け入れるのを助けます。

本当質問と回答の練習モード

現代技術のおかげで、オンラインで学ぶことで人々はより広い範囲の知識（ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor有効な練習問題集）を知られるように、人々は電子機器の利便性に慣れてきました。このため、私たちはあなたの記憶能力を効果的かつ適切に高めるという目標をどのように達成するかに焦点を当てます。したがって、AI management system (AIMS)　ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor練習問題と答えが最も効果的です。あなたはこのISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam有用な試験参考書でコア知識を覚えていて、練習中にISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam試験の内容も熟知されます。これは時間を節約し、効率的です。

デモをダウンロードする

ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験学習資料の三つバージョンの便利性

私たちの候補者はほとんどがオフィスワーカーです。あなたはISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam試験の準備にあまり時間がかからないことを理解しています。したがって、異なるバージョンのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験トピック問題をあなたに提供します。読んで簡単に印刷するには、PDFバージョンを選択して、メモを取るのは簡単です。 もしあなたがISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Examの真のテスト環境に慣れるには、ソフト（PCテストエンジン）バージョンが最適です。そして最後のバージョン、ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditorテストオンラインエンジンはどの電子機器でも使用でき、ほとんどの機能はソフトバージョンと同じです。ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam試験勉強練習の3つのバージョンの柔軟性と機動性により、いつでもどこでも候補者が学習できます。私たちの候補者にとって選択は自由でそれは時間のロースを減少します。

現代IT業界の急速な発展、より多くの労働者、卒業生やIT専攻の他の人々は、昇進や高給などのチャンスを増やすために、プロのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験認定を受ける必要があります。 試験に合格させる高品質のISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam試験模擬pdf版があなたにとって最良の選択です。私たちのISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Examテストトピック試験では、あなたは簡単にISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験に合格し、私たちのISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam試験資料から多くのメリットを享受します。

PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor 認定 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 試験問題:

1. A global bank is currently evaluating the effectiveness of its AI management system controls through an AIMS audit. Which role is being played by this company?

A) An advisory body
B) An auditee
C) A certification body
D) An accreditation body

2. What among the below list of steps comes before the other ones in the management system audit process?

A) Performing document review
B) Initiating the audit
C) Conducting the opening meeting
D) Preparing the audit report

3. Which control in Annex A of ISO 42001:2023 focuses on the need for stakeholder engagement in AI system development?

A) Stakeholder Consultation
B) Risk Assessment
C) Data Management
D) Continuous Improvement

4. Scenario 4 (continued):
BioNovaPharm, a German biopharmaceutical company, has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMSbased on ISO/IEC 42001 to optimize various aspects of drug discovery, including analyzing extensive biological data, identifying potentialdrug candidates, and streamlining clinical trial processes. After having the AIMS in place for over a year, the company contracted acertification body and is now undergoing an AIMS audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 42001.
Adopting a risk-based approach, the audit team focused on risk throughout their activities. The level of detail outlined in the audit plancorresponded to the scope and complexity of the audit. The team employed a ranking system for detailed audit procedures, prioritizingthose with the highest risk.
Once the stage 1 audit began, the audit team started reviewing the auditee's documented information. To assess whether BioNovaPharmcomplies with the legal and regulatory requirements related to incident communication, the audit team examined evidence provided bythe company's external legal office. The evidence confirmed that BioNovaPharm applies the requirements of the EU Al Act, whichmandates that providers of high-risk Al systems report serious incidents to relevant authorities.
Following the completion of the stage 1 audit, John, an audit team member, documented the stage 1 audit outputs, including theobservations of the audit team that could result in nonconformities during the on-site audit. However, the audit team leader, Emma, whowas overseeing the audit activities, observed that John failed to document significant observations related to the lack of transparency inthe Al decision-making processes of BioNovaPharm. Considering that Emma observed John's lack of competence in undertaking some audit activities, a disciplinary note was recorded for John.
Question:
What level of negligence did Emma observe regarding John's audit documentation failures?

A) Minor error
B) Fraud
C) Gross negligence
D) Ordinary negligence

5. Scenario 8 (continued):
Scenario 8:
Scenario 8: InnovateSoft, headquartered in Berlin, Germany, is a software development company known for its innovative solutions andcommitment to excellence. It specializes in custom software solutions, development, design, testing, maintenance, and consulting,covering both mobile apps and web development.
Recently, the company underwent an audit to evaluate the effectiveness and compliance of its artificial intelligence management system AIMS against ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit team engaged with the auditee to discuss their findings and observations during the audit's final phases. After evaluating theevidence, the audit team presented their audit findings to InnovateSoft, highlighting the identified nonconformities.
Upon receiving the audit findings, InnovateSoft accepted the conclusions but expressed concerns about some findings inaccuratelyreflecting the efficiency of their software development processes. In response, the company provided new evidence and additionalinformation to alter the audit conclusions for a couple of minor nonconformities identified. After thorough consideration, the audit teamleader clarified that the new evidence did not significantly alter the core conclusions drawn for the nonconformities. Therefore, thecertification body issued a certification recommendation conditional upon the filing of corrective action plans without a prior visit.
InnovateSoft accepted the decision of the certification body. The top management of the company also sought suggestions from theaudit team on resolving the identified nonconformities. The audit team leader offered solutions to address the issues, fostering acollaborative effort between the auditors and InnovateSoft.During the closing meeting, the audit team covered key topics to enhance transparency. They clarified to InnovateSoft that the auditevidence was based on a sample, acknowledging the inherent uncertainty. The method and time frame of reporting and grading findingswere discussed to provide a structured overview of nonconformities. The certification body's process for handling nonconformities,including potential consequences, guided InnovateSoft on corrective actions. The time frame for presenting a plan for correction was communicated, emphasizing urgency. Insights into the certification body's post-audit activities were provided, ensuring ongoing support.
Lastly, the audit team briefed InnovateSoft on complaint and appeal handling.
InnovateSoft submitted the action plans for each nonconformity separately, describing only the detected issues and the correctiveactions planned to address the detected nonconformities. However, the submission slightly exceeded the specified period of 45 days setby the certification body, arriving three days later.
InnovateSoft explained this by attributing the delay to unexpected challengesencountered during the compilation of the action plans.
InnovateSoft submitted corrective action plans for nonconformities three days past the certification body's deadline of 45 days.
Question:
Based on Scenario 8, is InnovateSoft eligible for certification?

A) Yes, it is up to the auditee to decide when to submit the action plans
B) No, the action plans were not submitted within the specified period
C) Yes, the submission of the action plans can be delayed for up to 10 days

質問と回答：