一番質高い CTAL-TAE_V2 試験問題集

As a TA-E, you have successfully verified that a test automation environment and all other components of the TAS are working as expected. Now your goal is to verify the correct behavior for a given automated test suite that will be run by the TAS. Which of the following should NOT be part of the verifications aimed at achieving your goal?

• A. Does the level of intrusion of automated test tools influence confidence in the suite's test results?
• B. Do all automated tests within the suite always provide the same results across multiple runs?
• C. Is the connectivity between the TAS and the necessary internal and external systems available and stable?
• D. Are all automated tests within the suite complete in terms of test data, including expected results?

In a first possible implementation, the automated test scripts within a suite locate and interact with elements of a web UI indirectly through the browsers using browser-specific drivers and APIs, provided by an automated test tool used as part of the TAS. In an alternative implementation, these test scripts locate and interact with elements of the same web UI directly at the HTML level by accessing the DOM (Document Object Model) and internal JavaScript code. The first possible implementation:

• A. Has a lower level of intrusion than the alternative implementation, and therefore its test scripts are less likely to produce false positives
• B. Has a lower level of intrusion than the alternative implementation, and therefore its test scripts are more likely to produce false positives
• C. Has the same level of intrusion as the alternative implementation, and therefore the risk of test scripts producing false positives is the same in both cases
• D. Has a higher level of intrusion than the alternative implementation, and therefore its test scripts are less likely to produce false positives

As a TAE, you are evaluating a test automation tool to automate some UI tests for a web app. The automated tests will first locate the required HTML elements on the web page using their corresponding identifiers (locators), then perform actions on those elements, and finally check the presence of any expected text for an HTML element. These tests are independent of each other and are organized into a test suite that must be run every night against the most recent build of the web app. There is a high risk that the web app will crash while running some automated tests. Based only on the given information, which of the following is your MOST important concern related to the evaluation of the test automation tool?

• A. Does the test automation tool offer a feature to create a mock server that simulates the behavior of a real API by accepting requests and returning responses?
• B. Does the test automation tool support a licensing scheme that allows accessing different feature sets?
• C. Does the test automation tool offer a feature to restore the web app, recover from the failed test, skip such tests, and resume the next one in the suite?
• D. Does the test automation tool provide a feature to specify automated tests in a descriptive meta- language that is not directly executable on the web app?

A suite of automated test cases was run multiple times on the same release of the SUT in the same test environment. Consider analyzing a test histogram that shows the distribution of test results (pass, fail, etc.) for each test case across these runs. Which of the following potential issues is MOST likely to be identified as a result of such an analysis?

• A. Security vulnerabilities in automated test cases
• B. Maintainability issues in automated test cases
• C. Outliers in test execution times
• D. Unstable automated test cases

Which of the following recommendations can help improve the maintainability of test automation code?

• A. Avoid adopting design patterns that introduce high levels of abstraction in test automation code, such as the flow model pattern
• B. Avoid producing test automation code containing methods with too many levels of nesting, as deeply nested code is more difficult to understand
• C. Avoid using static analyzers on test automation code and other development tools, as they are designed to improve the maintainability of SUT code
• D. Use error codes in test automation code instead of exceptions (if exceptions are supported by the programming language) for error handling